The CKC Challenge: Exploring Tools for Collaborative Knowledge Construction
- by Natalya F. Noy, Abhita Chugh, Harith Alani, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 64-68, Jan/Feb, 2008
Mash me up, Mash me down: Restructuring Email for Content Sharing and Collaboration in Distributed Teams
- Nelson, L.D. and Churchill, E.F., CSCW 2006 Workshop on Mashups, Banff, November 2006.
Teamwork Behaviors, A Review and an Integration of Frameworks
- by Vincent Rousseau, Caroline Aubé, André Savoie, Small Group Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 540-570 (2006)
Towards a pattern language for networked learning
- Goodyear, P, Avgeriou, P, Baggetun, R, Bartoluzzi, S, Retalis, S, Ronteltap, F, and Rusman, E (2005).
- In: Networked learning 2004. Edited by Banks, S and Goodyear, P and Hodgson, V and Jones, C and Lally, V and McConnell, D and Steeples, C. Lancaster University Lancaster.
Is there a "big five" in teamwork?
- Salas E , Sims DE, Burke CS. (2004)
- Small Group Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, 555-599 (2005)
- McAfee, Andrew (2005); "Will Web Services Really Transform Collaboration?" MIT Sloan Management Review 46, no. 2 (winter 2005): 78-84.
Cognitive style and team role preference
- by Stephen G. Fisher, W.D. Keith Macrosson and John Wong
- Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 8, 1998
- The empirical bases for the model, nine years of research and extensive work in industry, not only validates the claim but helps convince the reader of the security of the findings: optimal team performance may be obtained when each of the eight team role behaviours can be provided by the members of the team. If a given team contains a chairman or co-ordinator, an implementer or company worker, a completer, a monitor evaluator, a plant, a resource investigator, a shaper, a specialist, and a team worker, the team types which emerged through a process of observation and reflection, and which are more fully characterised later in this paper, then the best possible outcome is likely.